[BC] Why an older transmitter may be a good choice

[Robert Meuser]

I have no clue, I am just stating what the database shows. It IS at 
least accepted for filing.

R


Bailey, Scott wrote:

>This is true, but Robert my question is do you think they will consider
>these type moves? I recall the rumor where they wanted to move KWKH from
>Shreveport, LA to Dallas.
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
>[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Robert Meuser
>Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 2:53 PM
>To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [BC] Why an older transmitter may be a good choice
>
>If Clear Channel can do it with a 50K station, why can't anyone else do
>it.
>
>R
>
>
>Bailey, Scott wrote:
>
>  
>
>>There were several of those type apps filed. I just wonder, who's idea
>>this was thinking the FCC would consider such?
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
>>[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Kent Winrich
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 1:57 PM
>>To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
>>Subject: Re: [BC] Why an older transmitter may be a good choice
>>
>>You may want to look at that application again.... it says something
>>about being in Nevada.  A tad bit of distance from Abbeville, SC.  The
>>FCC database strikes again!
>>
>>
>>On 2/20/07, Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net> wrote:
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Thanks for the invite. As it turns out I'll be in Atlanta next month.
>>>I'll see how my time is.
>>>
>>>I just looked up your station on the FCC web site.  Why didn't you
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>tell
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>us that there is an application for a very major change and power
>>>increase? I could fully understand keeping an old Gates running until
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>it
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>was time to order the 25KW box.  I guess someone there has access to
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>