[BC] Why an older transmitter may be a good choice

[Robert Meuser]

If Clear Channel can do it with a 50K station, why can't anyone else do it.

R


Bailey, Scott wrote:

>There were several of those type apps filed. I just wonder, who's idea
>this was thinking the FCC would consider such?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
>[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Kent Winrich
>Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 1:57 PM
>To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [BC] Why an older transmitter may be a good choice
>
>You may want to look at that application again.... it says something
>about being in Nevada.  A tad bit of distance from Abbeville, SC.  The
>FCC database strikes again!
>
>
>On 2/20/07, Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>Thanks for the invite. As it turns out I'll be in Atlanta next month.
>>I'll see how my time is.
>>
>>I just looked up your station on the FCC web site.  Why didn't you
>>    
>>
>tell
>  
>
>>us that there is an application for a very major change and power
>>increase? I could fully understand keeping an old Gates running until
>>    
>>
>it
>  
>
>>was time to order the 25KW box.  I guess someone there has access to
>>    
>>
>money.
>  
>
>>R
>>
>>Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Right now, we OWN EVERTYHING here.. the building, property,
>>>transmitter and
>>>equipment. When the billing goes up to a point I can afford it, I
>>>      
>>>
>will
>  
>
>>>get a
>>>solid state unit.. trust me
>>>
>>>If you're ever in the Atlanta, GA or Greenville/Columbia, SC area..
>>>you are
>>>MORE THEN WELCOME to come and pay me a visit in
>>>