[BC] Re: HD Receiver returns

Ron Cole rondcole
Sat Feb 17 15:29:44 CST 2007


Here in the DFW area when when the stations added IBUZ it forced them to 
update their RF plants.
Gone at the 30+ year old FM Transmitters and all the intermod those 
things were spewing across the dial.
As to secondary channels I never come across a dead one and when I 
listen to FM I listen to secondaries more then the primary channel, 
little to no commercials on the secondary channels for now.

Ron
Dallas, Tx.





Rich Wood wrote:
> ------ At 08:30 AM 2/17/2007, WFIFeng at aol.com wrote: -------
>
>> Yes, even coming from me, an IBUZ doubter since the thing first 
>> launched... I
>> find it sad because so much capital has been invested in this thing, 
>> yet it
>> is being neglected to the N'th degree. It is unfathomable to me to 
>> spend so
>> much and care so little.
>
> That's where we part company. IBUZ has prompted major investment in 
> outdated plants. If nothing else comes of it we'll have better 
> facilities for the next 30 years. Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems 
> to me the high cost of  IBUZ isn't the IBUZ equipment but the repair 
> and replacement of the aged equipment you need to shove it through. 
> Ultimately the biggest expense will be the royalties stations will pay 
> year after year after year.
>
> Rich
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and 
> More! www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    
> Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>



More information about the Broadcast mailing list