[BC] Re: HD Receiver returns
Ron Cole
rondcole
Sat Feb 17 15:29:44 CST 2007
Here in the DFW area when when the stations added IBUZ it forced them to
update their RF plants.
Gone at the 30+ year old FM Transmitters and all the intermod those
things were spewing across the dial.
As to secondary channels I never come across a dead one and when I
listen to FM I listen to secondaries more then the primary channel,
little to no commercials on the secondary channels for now.
Ron
Dallas, Tx.
Rich Wood wrote:
> ------ At 08:30 AM 2/17/2007, WFIFeng at aol.com wrote: -------
>
>> Yes, even coming from me, an IBUZ doubter since the thing first
>> launched... I
>> find it sad because so much capital has been invested in this thing,
>> yet it
>> is being neglected to the N'th degree. It is unfathomable to me to
>> spend so
>> much and care so little.
>
> That's where we part company. IBUZ has prompted major investment in
> outdated plants. If nothing else comes of it we'll have better
> facilities for the next 30 years. Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems
> to me the high cost of IBUZ isn't the IBUZ equipment but the repair
> and replacement of the aged equipment you need to shove it through.
> Ultimately the biggest expense will be the royalties stations will pay
> year after year after year.
>
> Rich
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and
> More! www.SystemsStore.com Tel: 407-656-3719
> Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list