[BC] Re: HD Receiver returns

[Rich Wood]

------ At 08:30 AM 2/17/2007, WFIFeng at aol.com wrote: -------

>Yes, even coming from me, an IBUZ doubter since the thing first launched... I
>find it sad because so much capital has been invested in this thing, yet it
>is being neglected to the N'th degree. It is unfathomable to me to spend so
>much and care so little.

That's where we part company. IBUZ has prompted major investment in 
outdated plants. If nothing else comes of it we'll have better 
facilities for the next 30 years. Correct me if I'm wrong but it 
seems to me the high cost of  IBUZ isn't the IBUZ equipment but the 
repair and replacement of the aged equipment you need to shove it 
through. Ultimately the biggest expense will be the royalties 
stations will pay year after year after year.

Rich