[BC] Monitoring IBUZ Secondaries - NOT

[Rich Wood]

------ At 01:57 PM 2/16/2007, Kent Winrich wrote: -------

>Funny, out of all of the HD2 listening I have done, not once have I heard
>this double audio you talk about.  Most of the stations I have listened to
>have smooth transitions and well timed out.  Guess I am just lucky?

Lucky to have things operate as they should? That should be standard 
operating procedure, not luck. I guess I'm unlucky because I heard it 
and was unable to reach anyone at the largest station in Hartford run 
by the second largest corporation in the business. I hope there's 
never an emergency in Hartford that a listener wants to report. 
Sounds like another Minot type situation in the making. Even if Minot 
never happened

>I have, on the other hand, heard it a number of times on good ol' analog.
>
>Bottom line is that broadcasters need to care about their product no matter
>the format: analog, HD or on-line.

This is a good sign. No apology for sloppy operation. By the way, the 
other secondary in Enfield, CT, is now 3 hours and 10 minutes into 
silence. Still pumping out titles and artists but no audio. It's a 
station run by the largest company in the business. So much for 
devotion to IBUZ.

Rich