[BC] Split level combine and the loss of the analog-only transmitter
RichardBJohnson@comcast.net
RichardBJohnson
Sat Apr 21 15:13:15 CDT 2007
In New England many stations don't even know if they are on-the-air.
Last Sunday morning I hit WCRB (99.5 MHz on my truck radio. There
was no audio from 9:00 AM through 12:15 PM. The audio probably failed
before that. The radio station didn't answer their telephone either.
Now, I may be naive. I thought that if a STL failed, the transmitter
was required to be off-the-air. I guess it's okay to have three hours
of dead air nowadays. Nobody is watching.
--
Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson
Read about my book
http://www.LymanSchool.org
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Rich Wood <richwood at pobox.com>
> ------ At 02:38 AM 4/21/2007, Xmitters at aol.com wrote: -------
>
> > Clearly, for non-emergency operation the digital power must be reduced
> > to maintain the mask, but, if the operation is declared and justified
> > as emergency operation, and there are no rules for what you ask
> > specificly, it's a good question ! Reasonable and prudent men
> > would allow the full power HD level, but the
> > Commission is full of lawyers, who are not known to be reasonable,
> > nor prudent.
>
> It seems reasonable and prudent men would know there are so few
> digital receivers that, even if the digital power were allowed to go
> to analog levels, virtually no one would hear it. How can anyone make
> the case at this point in time that digital can be used for emergency
> communication? New England has recently had major flooding. Every
> IBUZ station here has had long periods with no digital operation. If
> we relied on it we'd all have been washed away.
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list