[BC] Doing remotes in 2007
Dana Puopolo
dpuopolo
Thu Apr 5 10:32:42 CDT 2007
I'[ve seen this same thing happen with traffic reports. Four Boston stations
used to share a helicopter for traffic reports. Three of us used 2 way radios,
but one (3 letter call) had to sound better, so they put in a full blown UHF
Marti system. Problem was, they didn't sound like they were in a helicopter
any more-and it cost them credibility with listeners who thought they were
being deceived. They're back to the 2 way again.
-D
------ Original Message ------
Received:
From: Barry Mishkind <barry at oldradio.com>
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [BC] Doing remotes in 2007
Goran,
It is interesting to me to see this sort of comment.
Of course, there are many different types of "remote"
broadcasts, from drop-ins from the local car dealer to
a symphony hall concert.
However, in many cases, there is a level of obsession that
goes beyond the level of balance.
As has often been noted here, CONTENT is usually more
important to the listener than the absolute purity of sound.
In fact, I've had more than one PD agree that if the
"marti shot" is too good, then how does the listener
know there really is a remote going on?
Now, I do *not* advocate the bare cell phone remote.
They almost always sound horrid. In fact, I know
of some cancellations caused by lazy staff who would
rather not set up the remote gear, but use the cell
phone since "it was only two breaks"
Just like a sports broadcast usually seeks to ADD
crowd noise instead of having the relative silence
of the booth back the play by play, many remotes
actually "benefit" from the audio being something
less than perfect.
_______________________________________________
The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More!
www.SystemsStore.com Tel: 407-656-3719 Sales at SystemsStore.com
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list