[BC] Band Migration
Robert Meuser
Robertm
Tue Jan 24 06:12:53 CST 2006
I will go back to my original point. Your owners knew this going in. That was
part of the terms of the deal, so either live with it or sell to the next sucker.
I have worked at similar daytimers on clear channels it is life. In a few cases
we found work arounds. If we had the same format as the clear, we had a remote
receiver on a dial up 30 or 40 miles away. We synchronized programming to the
clear and did a fast minimally legal sign off and carrier cut to hit their next
jingle. To the listener this gave 24 hour service.
R
RT
WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 01/23/2006 6:44:12 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> Robertm at broadcast.net writes:
>
>
>>You act as though low powered daytimers have some right to more coverage.
>
>> Remember the original owners bought into the situation willingly and
>>subsequent
>> owners bought the station knowing what it was. Daytimers were quick buck
>>entry
>> into radio when it was a virtual mint. Most money is made in the daytime
>
> so
>
>>why broadcast at night?
>
>
> Because "Daytime" in winter is from after 7am until only ~4:30pm. (YMMV) That
> means a good portion of AM drive, and about half of PM drive is *gone*. For
> stations like WFIF, that time is cut even shorter when the atmosphere favors
> skywave and WTOP obliterates us even in our 10mv coverage area! (They do do this
> from time-to-time.)
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list