[BC] RE: Solving the problem
Robert Orban
rorban
Sun Jan 22 00:36:58 CST 2006
At 10:00 PM 1/21/2006, you wrote:
>From: "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3 at msn.com>
>Subject: [BC] RE: Solving the problem
>To: <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>Message-ID: <BAY104-DAV18CB1F9B5A8A677A091B5AFC110 at phx.gbl>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>I see it exactly the opposite. Having spent a fair part of my "career"
>working on wireless OFDM projects and speech coding for them, my vote is
>that it is not at all possible in the near term to get enough bits per
>second out of current OFDM + error coding techniques to support FM quality
>audio with AM IBOC. Nor is it possible to reduce the audio coding rate to
>squeeze FM quality audio into AM IBOC's 36 kb/s. (See anybody else getting
>that kind of quality in that range of bit rates?) Result: middling audio and
>interference.
aacPlusV2 sounds quite decent at 36 kbps in stereo, although certainly not
"FM-quality" to my ears. DRM made the correct choice when they chose that
codec.
Bob Orban
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list