[BC] Loss of high end in mono...
Burt I. Weiner
biwa
Wed Jan 18 12:24:55 CST 2006
That may well be, but for FM broadcast it would not meet the (still)
required compliance to put a filter in to reduce the high frequencies
below 15 kHz. Maybe I'm missing your point?
Burt
At 08:38 AM 1/18/2006, you wrote:
>From: Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net>
>Subject: Re: [BC] Losing High End In Mono...
>To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>Message-ID: <43CDE456.7050907 at broadcast.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>no some time it is by design as in a low pass filter.
>
>
>
>R
>
>Burt I. Weiner wrote:
> > I would agree with all of these except the loss of high end. To me, loss
> > of high end in mono generally indicates phase issues, a problem which
> > has been mostly ignored or forgotten about since audio proofs are no
> > longer required.
> >
> > Burt
Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, California U.S.A.
biwa at earthlink.net
K6OQK
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list