[BC] HD Alliance

[WFIFeng@aol.com]

In a message dated 01/15/2006 12:04:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
curt at spam-o-matic.net writes:

>  While you have raised some valid points, I do think that the pronouncement
>   of the death of technology is a bit premature.

I am totally in agreement with Rich about IBUZ, and I don't think he is 
saying that digital technology is dead... and I certainly don't think so, either. 
Since I cannot speak for him, I will simply say that I have no problem with 
*Digital Technology*, in fact, I embrace it...  I have a *big* problem with this 
particular implementation, though, especially on AM. I think the moniker 
"IBUZ" fits it to a "T". It trashes two stations for each *one* that it assists. 
How is that "helpful"?

Death to IBUZ, yes. Death to Digital? No way.

Willie...