[BC] Junk Fax comments due 1/19/06

[Phil Longenecker]

Just like gummint to try to preserve Junk Faxes. What are they, an
endangered species? Will we have to keep them in the Public File for two
years? Are there so many junk fases that the gummint has decided to
force recycling to save all the wasted paper so another tree may still
stand? And what about the toner cartridges, willl they be next for
preservation. I can see all the Brother and Panasonic fax machines
getting Historic designations so we won't be able to throw them out when
they're broken. What's next, SPAM preservation, keep all your male
enhancement emails, they may be of cultural significance, someday.

Sheesh...

<snip
From: "Harold Hallikainen" <harold at hallikainen.com>
Subject: [BC] Junk Fax comments due 1/19/06
To: broadcast at radiolists.net
Message-ID:
	<57446.192.168.1.1.1136868606.squirrel at sujan.hallikainen.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

Comments on new FCC rules implementing the Junk Fax Preservation Act of
2005 are due 1/19/06. It's Docket 05-338 . You can see comments filed
thus
far and file your own comments at
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi .

<unsnip



Phil Longenecker, CE
Red Rock Radio, Duluth, MN
KQDS FM KQDS AM WWAX KZIO
KBAJ KAOD WXXZ
Cell 218.590.5907? Fax 218.723.1499