[BC] Dark station.... Violations.. who is responsible

[Bailey, Scott]

Gary,
   Explain how?

-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Gary Glaenzer
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 12:22 PM
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [BC] Dark station.... Violations.. who is responsible

'attactive nuisance' ????


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bailey, Scott" <sbailey at nespower.com>

It depends, if the licensee has turned in the licensee, the property
owner is responsible to maintain lighting on that tower until it is
taken down. I don't think it would be necessary about fixing the fence,
if there is no RF coming from the tower.

If the licensee has not turned in the licensee, then the licensee is
responsible for lighting the tower and making sure the fence is in good
shape and is locked, even if no RF is coming from it, and the station is
dark.


_______________________________________________

The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More! 
www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com