[BC] Two Clear Channel workers fall from a Denver radio tower

[Cowboy]

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 02:12 pm, RichardBJohnson at comcast.net wrote:

>  When I used to climb towers, the methods used were to keep ones belt stowed 
>  while climbing, then feed it through a tower member, clasp it, then lean 
>  back to let it take your weight while resting.

 Positioning lanyards, yes. That's still pretty standard.

>  Typically, we would climb  
>  two or three sections at a time, a section being about 20 feet. Using this 
>  method of slow-climb would allow anybody who was fit to climb even 1,000 
>  foot towers.

 Also still fairly typical.
 Typically, I go three sections or so, then stop for a rest and a smoke.
 ;)

>  In particular, you are no longer able to climb without the belt  
>  secured to a tower member! I do not have a clue how this is possible, you 
>  would need two belts, one to use while you unhook the other to get it 
>  around a horizontal member.

 A good climbers fall arrest does have two lanyards, and two rebar hooks,
 as does mine. You know how it's possible, just as you describe.
 Yes, it takes longer. Yes, it's more weight. Yes, it costs more.
 The comfort that comes from knowing you CAN NOT fall while climbing
 is well worth it to me. ( barring structure collapse )

>  I seriously doubt anybody actually does that,  
>  just as I seriously doubt that anybody uses a table-saw with its guard in 
>  place!      

 I'll admit to not using the guard on the table saw, but I'm one that ALWAYS
 climbs with 100% tie-off !

-- 
Cowboy