[BC] IBOC power Increase For FM stations
Paul Ford
wpfr at joink.com
Thu Jul 16 10:46:34 CDT 2009
Warren Schulz, WLS
The best common sense I've seen regarding this matter for a long time.
Paul Dean Ford, P.E.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Warren Shulz <warren.shulz at citcomm.com>wrote:
>
> That IBOC power increase is more bad science. By iBiquity's own
> admission the 1% power was selected to prevent interference to analog.
> If we have 80% IBOC receiver deployment it would make sense. But, with a
> 1% deployment its nut to kill analog performance for the 1% IBOC radios
> rolled out.
>
> If I dial an analog radio with a RF signal strength meter the hiss of
> IBOC carriers cover the entire Chicago FM dial. Going to 10% power will
> kill analog reception resulting in a sea of carrier hiss. In Chicago
> few have the capability to go to 10% without yet another transmitter
> plant rebuild.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list