[BC] Antenna Question

[Tom]

Way down at the bottom, 73.525 says:

" (4) The maximum permissible effective radiated power (ERP) and antenna 
height may be adjusted for vertical polarity as follows:

(i) If the applicant chooses to use vertically polarized transmissions 
only, the maximum permissible vertically polarized ERP will be the 
maximum horizontally polarized ERP permissible at the same proposed 
antenna height, calculated without the adjustment for television 
receiving antenna directivity specified in paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this 
section, multiplied by either: 40 if the predicted interference area 
lies entirely outside the limits of a city of 50,000 persons or more; or 
10 if it does not."



RSTYPE at aol.com wrote:
>  
> In a message dated 5/11/2008 9:42:15 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> wpio at gate.net writes:
>
> Carl,
>
> It is treacherous on my part to "correct" a consultant,  but 
> that restriction doesn't exist in the rules.  I have filed  
> and gotten CP's for V Pol only and it wasn't to comply with 
> the  73.525.  It was for economics.  (power  bill)
>
>
>
>
> Randy:
>  
> This may be a recent change in FCC policy (which sometimes I think changes  
> depending on the day of the week and the person who processes the application)  
> or you just got lucky.  I'm positive, however, that the vertical ERP cannot  
> exceed the horizontal ERP for stations in the non-reserved band above 92  MHz.
>  
> Roy Stype
>
>
>
> **************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family 
> favorites at AOL Food.      
> (http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore - Your Premium
> Supplier Of Components To Build and Maintain A Technical Infrastructure
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>
>   

-- 
Tom Spencer
PG-18-25453 (nee' P1-18-48841)
http://radioxtz.com/
Part 15 transmitters on AM 640 and FM 100.1