[BC] A Pig in a Poke, not Polk

[Rich Wood]

------ At 10:25 AM 8/27/2006, John Hettish wrote: -------

>Excuse me but I can stand it no more.  The phrase is actually a "Pig in a
>POKE" not Polk.  You can find more information that you could possibly want
>to know by following this link.

This reminds me of a nun who constantly complained that advertising 
slogans were often grammatically incorrect and set bad examples for 
children. Go back through the archives and reread what we're 
discussing. The English language is wonderful in how it can be 
"modified" with plays on words. "A Pig in a Polk" refers to the Polk 
IBUZ receiver.

Have you ever been a schoolmarm?

Rich