[BC] IBOC Tentatively Identified as Interfering Signal

[WFIFeng@aol.com]

In a message dated 08/14/2006 10:59:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
kwinrich at gmail.com writes:

> Come on, arent you overblowing this a tad?

I don't know... Am I? Think about it. We're headed down that slippery slope, 
already. The interference is already very real, and very hard to ignore... and 
that's with only a handful of stations currently operating it with nearly 
Daytime-Only hours.

Willie...

(Quoted & trimmed, below, to keep the above in context)

>  On 8/14/06, WFIFeng at aol.com <WFIFeng at aol.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > In a message dated 08/14/2006 02:59:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>  > dynotherm at earthlink.net writes:
>  >
>  > > This may be a bit cynical, but ultimately the only protected
>  > >  coverage is going to be that in the COL or SMA, inside the
>  > >  5.0 daytime and established NIF or 5.0, which ever is greater,
>  > Yeah... with 5k wstations getting only a few miles, 50K maybe 10-15 
miles?
>  > That would be the day... can you imagine the
>  > outcry from the powerhouse stations, when their coverage is reduced to
>  > little more than that of a "graveyarder"? (and the "graveyarders"
>  > would get about a mile or 2 - the new TIS!)
>  >
>  > Willie...