[BC] IBOC Tentatively Identified as Interfering Signal

[Kent Winrich]

Come on, arent you overblowing this a tad?

On 8/14/06, WFIFeng at aol.com <WFIFeng at aol.com> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 08/14/2006 02:59:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> dynotherm at earthlink.net writes:
>
> > This may be a bit cynical, but ultimately the only protected
> >  coverage is going to be that in the COL or SMA, inside the
> >  5.0 daytime and established NIF or 5.0, which ever is greater,
> >  at night IMHO. Then, it would seem to be a significant
> >  economic issue that can't be brushed aside.
>
> Yeah... with 5k wstations getting only a few miles, 50K maybe 10-15 miles?
> (In the Northeast, anyway. You folks in the south & midwest have vastly
> superior
> ground conductivity than we do.) That would be the day... can you imagine
> the
> outcry from the powerhouse stations, when their coverage is reduced to
> little
> more than that of a "graveyarder"? (and the "graveyarders" would get about
> a
> mile or 2 - the new TIS!)
>
> Willie...
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More!
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>