[BC] Public Service Communications
Blake Bowers
bbowers
Sun Oct 23 01:16:27 CDT 2005
Uh, Rich, are you trying to say that NYPD was using
digital radios during the towers collapse?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Wood" <richwood at pobox.com>
To: "Broadcast Radio Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: [BC] Public Service Communications
> ------ At 08:33 PM 10/22/2005, DHultsman5 at aol.com wrote: -------
>
>>TV stations and the NAB have nothing to do with it, The main reason we
>>don't have interoperatable public radio systems is local police, sheriff,
>>state
>>troopers and fire departments want their own channels and don;'t want to
>>share anything. They all have their fifdoms and between them and APCO
>>they get
>>what they want. And you and I pay for it.
>
> Part of the 9/11 problem was that a FEMA-like contract went out to replace
> the analog NYPD radios with digital. There was a big stink when they
> discovered that they weren't effective in many buildings. They hadn't been
> properly tested. I have NYPD friends who were angry as hell to find their
> most important weapon wasn't reliable. I believe part of the problem was
> that the repeaters within the World Trade Center hadn't been updated.
> First responders never got the order to evacuate.
>
> Rich
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list