[BC] RE: HD Radio -- Folks we have to get it right!

Mike McCarthy Towers
Mon Oct 17 10:23:34 CDT 2005


And those which have good content on one will probably create good content 
on #2 and so on.

MM

At 08:08 AM 10/17/2005 -0700, DANA PUOPOLO wrote
>GAWD!!
>
>It isn't the signal...it's what's ON the signal!!
>
>People buy XM and Sirius because they LIKE THE CONTENT!
>
>People listen to WBZ and WEEI in Boston because they LIKE THE CONTENT!
>
>CONTENT RULES!!
>
>Instead of salivating at additional free radio stations, maybe managers and
>owners should instead FIX the ones they have now...
>Or at least (in the case of WCBS-FM - now Jack-FM with 1/3 the ratings) LEAVE
>IT ALONE!
>
>-D
>
>
>
>You'll take Rich seriously after IBUZ fails to impress the public, even when
>or if it is mandated, and the remainder of your sellable audience switches
>to XM, with it's awesomely incredible 96Kbps mostly commercial free signals
>that blow IBUZ away... :-)
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>http://www.radiolists.net/



More information about the Broadcast mailing list