[BC] HD Radio -- Folks we have to get it right!
Mike
engineermike
Mon Oct 17 09:30:28 CDT 2005
Well you brought up something I did leave out and thanks for point it
out. We are in fact going to stream the SAC in multiple formats so
listeners without HD radios can listen in and see what they are missing
and with hope as radios become more available and their funds become
available they will buy a radio and join us over the air instead of on
the web. By the way we will promote it on the air as we feel if they
are with us at any point either by listening to the main channel or
secondary or on the web or podcast then we have done our job and
provided what the listener wants to the best of our ability.
Have a good day
Back to the fund drive
Later
Mike
Rich Wood wrote:
>
> You're making part of my point for me. I agree that the secondary can't
> be an also ran. It has to be a real radio station. What I would do is
> also stream it on the web until there are receivers in the field. At
> this point in time you'll have a larger web audience than IBUZ. It might
> be a good way to introduce it to advertisers who might add it to their
> buy. Right now, streaming is understood and many ad agencies have web
> divisions. Promoting the web stream on your main might be a problem
> because you're suggesting listeners go elsewhere.
>
> Rich
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list