[BC] Clear Channel Wants More?

[Barry Mishkind]

Mike,

I didn't want to put this on the list, but yes. It SHOULD be corporate policy.

It was NOT at some of the places I was working ... or at least my 
attempts to get the GM and PDs to pay even the slightest attention 
was shrugged off as "not your concern."


At 01:37 PM 10/5/2005, Mike Gideon wrote
>That's something that can be fixed with corporate policy. For 
>example, Nashville has silince sensors that alarm in the central 
>control point, with a tuner that can be used for monitoring. It 
>isn't constant human monitoring, but catches the problems.
>
>This is left up to the local market, so you can get some of the old 
>Mom and Pop sound. If a corp policy was made, SOMEBODY on this list 
>would find something wrong with it.
>
>>         Anyone for a new Rule to demand someone
>>         monitor all stations and forbid dead carriers?)
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>>http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>http://www.radiolists.net/



_______________________________________________________________________
Barry Mishkind     -       Tucson, AZ    -   520-296-3797