[BC] IBOC in trouble?

[Barry McLarnon]

On Monday 25 July 2005 23:56, Phil Alexander wrote:
> <http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_
>document=6518012230>
>
> Watch the wrap.
>
> This is the document Clive mentions. It uses the lack of codec
> definition in NRSC-5 in what appears to be a very creative way.

Then read this one by Jonathon Hardis of NIST, who, unlike Microsoft,
has no dog in this race:

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6518010460

This is a tremendous piece of work that eclipses all the other filings
on NRSC-5, and yet the online radio mags haven't even mentioned it.
I wonder why...

In other news, Leonard Kahn has filed reply comments saying, in essence,
damn the torpedoes, let's go ahead with nighttime AM IBOC and let the fur fly!

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6518013817

Barry

-- 
Barry McLarnon VE3JF  Ottawa, ON