[BC] Re: No-code Amateur license

Rob Atkinson ranchorobbo
Mon Jul 25 16:35:21 CDT 2005


I once heard that broadcasters have an even harder time putting up antennas 
because they DON'T have PRB-1.

Rob Atkinson


(note the attempt at a broadcasting slant on this topic.)




From: Rich Wood <richwood at pobox.com>
Reply-To: Broadcast Radio Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
To: Broadcast Radio Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [BC] Re: No-code Amateur license
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:43:09 -0400

------ At 10:33 AM 7/25/2005, R J Carpenter wrote: -------

>The code isn't the only thing discouraging new hams.  In my county*,
>AFAIK no subdivision started within the past 40 years allows antennas.

What happened to PRB-1 that was supposed to allow "reasonable" ham antennas? 
I also think recent legislation prevents a developer from prohibiting dish 
antennas.

Rich
KF2JO

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/



More information about the Broadcast mailing list