[BC] WSJ on replacing Howard Stern

[cldube]

I find him enjoyable when he has a good guest on- preferably male as if it's 
a woman he tends to focus on her anatomy for
a bit too long which can get tedious. But when he had William Shatner on a 
few months ago it was a scream. Absolutely hilarious
as he will ask questions (with a great delivery) that no one else would- and 
the guests sometimes get surprised.

Chuck Dube
Amherst
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cowboy" <curt at spam-o-matic.net>
To: "Broadcast Radio Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [BC] WSJ on replacing Howard Stern


> On Friday 01 July 2005 11:11, Fred Gleason wrote:
>> On Thursday 30 June 2005 14:36, Rich Wood wrote:
>> > Howard is a very talented and intelligent man. So intelligent that he
>> > created this bad boy character and made it into a huge success. I 
>> > believe
>> > Howard is bigger than Larry King ever was.
>>
>> Hmm.  The few times I've tried listening to him, I've always moved on 
>> quickly.
>> Not so much because of the vulgarity (bad as that is), but because it's 
>> so
>> *boring* -- some of the most inane and repetitious drivel I've ever had 
>> to
>> sit through.
>
> Same here, or close. I don't find Howard a "superb broadcaster" by any 
> stretch.
> I just find his show to be bad radio, but I guess that's why I'm not a PD 
> ?
> ;-)
> Don't misunderstand. I don't begrudge his success, but it's not only just 
> "not me"
> but also it's just bad radio !
>
> -- 
> Cowboy
> http://spam-o-matic.com
> http://cowboys.homeip.net
>
> You know you've been spending too much time on the computer when your
> friend misdates a check, and you suggest adding a "++" to fix it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>