[AF] Ha!

[Tom Spencer]

Yes, exactly -

INTERPRET THE LAW, not he Constitution.

Does this law pass muster?  Show where this law (any law) is authorized 
by the Constitution (and the Constitution is a remarkably plain-spoken 
document, almost anyone with a sixth-grade education can figure it out...)

NO "gun control" law passes that muster - ALL such laws are prima facie 
COUNTER to the wording and intent or the Second Amendment.

Or, if they do, then "Miranda" is bad case law, because it basically 
says that the Amendments it's based on applies to states and other 
jurisdictions, while "Presser" et al., say the opposite.

One or the other is BAD CASE LAW.

Which would you prefer?  Me, I'll take the logic of Miranda - the 
Constitution applies to ALL jurisdictions within the United States.  
Presser et al says not - so Presser is bad case law.



Sid Schweiger wrote:

> ...this portion of Federalist No. 78:
>
> "[...]  If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.


-- 
Tom Spencer
PG-18-25453 (nee' P1-18-48841)
http://radioxtz.com/