[AF] Ha!

[Alan Kline]

I would suggest that it's rather difficult to determine if laws are in 
compliance with the Constitution if one doesn't understand the meaning 
of the latter; hence, the need for interpretation.

Gary Glaenzer wrote:
> From: "Sid Schweiger" <sid at wrko.com>
> 
> 
> 
>> ...which is, I suppose, why the courts have spent the past 220 years
> interpreting it.  Would it need so much interpretation if it were so simple?
> 
> 
> actually, I was under the impression that the USSC's job was to determine if
> LAWS were in compliance with the Constitution
> 
> you know, as in 'constitutional'