[EAS] Should the RWT EAS Code be abolished?
Mike McCarthy
towers at mre.com
Sat Nov 26 05:17:49 CST 2011
Then maybe we need a composite injection device and the EAS box placed
at the TX. Oh...they don't make that. Never did. Oh and the logging
requirements with the paper tape made is just beyond impractical to
place it at the TX. Then let's not forget the TX on a mountain which can
only be accessed twice a year for refueling.
MM
On 11/25/2011 10:12 PM, Barry Mishkind wrote:
> At 08:05 PM 11/25/2011, Mike McCarthy wrote:
>> It's 30 years too late. Especially with many processors still at the
>> TX's and no real means to convey real time closures ***to*** the
>> transmitter. No station is going to want an investment to freeze the
>> processor for down stream stations. Non-starter. Dead on arrival. That
>> train will never steam on.
> *that's* exactly the attitude that has
> brought EAS to the difficult place
> where it is ...
>
> Yes, it might be late.
>
> But it sure wouldn't hurt for broadcasters
> to take more control of what they do.
More information about the EAS
mailing list