[EAS] Should the RWT EAS Code be abolished?

[Mike McCarthy]

Barry,

It's this simple.  There are many licensees who would *****never**** 
test the box no matter the message.  Ever, nope, fugetaboutit.  I can 
use the sechedule of calibrations rules as an example.  Who follows that 
rule??  Virtually no one.  The same will occur with the RWT or any other 
required message if made optional.  The EAS will become even more an 
afterthought than a footnote and nuisance.

MM

On 11/24/2011 1:29 PM, Barry Mishkind wrote:
> Testing should be part of any operation's normal practices. It should 
> not be done only as "required." It should be done as often as 
> necessary to prove each operation's integrity. In fact, any test, 
> including DMO, would serve - *if* - anyone was auditing the output.