[EAS] Wish List

[Me]

Al's point of clarification on # 14 is right on the mark.  Our intent was  
indeed that EAS units should" render" or translate CAP into the EAS / SAME  
protocol.



Ed Czarnecki
Senior Director - Strategy, Development & Regulatory Affairs 
Monroe Electronics, Inc.

-----Original message-----
From: askenyon at cox.net
To: eas at radiolists.net
Cc: eas at radiolists.net
Sent: Fri, Feb 4, 2011 14:51:20 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [EAS] Wish List

Thanks for the URL Tom, that explains a lot.

I can speak to your first concern in #14:  In this case the word 
"render" was intended to indicate reduction, concantenation... in other 
words conversion of a CAP message to EAS SAME.  Probably not the 
clearest choice of words by the CSRIC Working Group.

Please note that #40 is NOT a CSRIC Working Group 5 recommendation but 
was a recommendation of the BWWG, the folks that established the 
eas.radiolists.net website and this listserve, mostly broadcast industy 
vets with extensive experience and intrest in EAS.  Items 34-44 are 
Broadcast Warining Working Group contributions not recommendations of a 
government working group.

I hope that eases your concern a bit.

Al Kenyon



On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Tom Taggart wrote:

> Al: Let's get on the same page first, I am referring to the
> "EAS Wish List" posted by Dick Rudman.  The direct link is
> here:
>
> http://eas.radiolists.net/info/Part11_wish.pdf
>
> Look along the left hand side of the document--each
> paragraph is numbered. Now go to #14:  "EAS Encoder must be
_______________________________________________
This is the EAS Forum Discussion List

Please invite your friends to join our Forum!
http://lists.radiolists.net/mailman/listinfo/eas

And, remember the main page: http://eas.radiolists.net