[BC] An Omen?
Cowboy
curt at cwf1.com
Sat Nov 16 13:24:45 CST 2013
On Friday 15 November 2013 08:28:51 pm Dana Puopolo wrote:
> Agreed. Barry and I experienced
What you describe is not a station *causing* harmful interference, but
a station merely acting as the catalyst to expose defective receive
equipment.
In my mind, not even a similar situation.
> From: richardbrianjohnson at verizon.net
> Interfering with a competitor does not constitute such an emergency requiring
> immediate action.
Again....
The rules talk about harmful interference to any other licensed service
or station, and I'm glad they do !
The rules do *not* talk about the content of such other service or station,
and I'm glad they don't !
While it may seem blindingly apparent to you and/or I, that dispatching a fire
brigade, or warning an aircraft of an impending collision might be a tad more
important than "Elliot in the Morning" I for one do not want the government
or any of the government's agents making that content determination.
That would be a form of censorship, direct or reverse. Freedom loving
Americans ( those that can remember freedom anyway ) already have a
problem with the government's heavy handed treatment of things not
considered politically correct. To make selective exception goes a bit
far for me.
--
Cowboy
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list