[BC] Microphones

[Broadcast List USER]

I have absolutely no filtering, only grey listing.

If you are running standard SMTP, I WILL get the message.

And, sorry, my day fell apart, and the earliest I could have called  
was after 9 PM, and I wouldn't want to do that.

If you need another cassette based answering machine, I have one, one  
line machine, still working well, purchased in 1983, and a much newer  
micro-cassette machine, which answers two lines, and has a little  
mechanical voice that asked people to hold on if the other line is  
being answered when the second line calls.  It even has two outgoing  
messages per line, which can be switched.

That should be enough extra text, sorry.

--chip

On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:22 AM, broadcast-request at radiolists.net wrote:

> Message: 29
> From: Cowboy <curt at spam-o-matic.net>
> [...]
>> You could have e-mailed me directly.
>
> Did. Several times.
>
> I'd rant about bad spam filters, but most already know
> how I feel about them, and especially them that throw out
> the baby with the bath water.
>
> The important question is that if *I* can't e-mail some
> individual directly, how many other *real* messages
> have been lost to bad filters ?
>
> Of course, though about 6 years behind everyone else, our
> favorite OS predator has come out with one of the better
> Bayesian filters.
> Not as good as a Spam-O-Matic, but very close !
> -- 
> Cowboy