[BC] Poor Reception Areas

[Cowboy]

On Wednesday 17 February 2010 02:24 pm, John Mayson wrote:
>  On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Tom Dimeo <am at pa321.net> wrote:

>  > Could it be all the iron in the ground that
>  > makes this area so poor for AM reception?
>  
>  Actually that is a problem.  Apparently what's good for transmitting
>  is lousy for receiving.

 Many think that transmission and reception are always reciprocal.
 Such is usually, but not *always* the case !

-- 
Cowboy