[BC] Internet STLs

[Broadcast List USER]

I am going to admit that I MIGHT be a minority regarding those who  
KNOW what they are listening to, but that isn't the complete story.

People listen to "compromised" audio.  They don't know why they don't  
like it, but they don't.

128 kbs audio sucks.

Used as an STL, it REALLY sucks

YOU have not really tested it.

I have, and it SUCKS.

--chip
On Feb 11, 2010, at 3:50 PM, broadcast-request at radiolists.net wrote:

> Message: 6
> From: "Dana  Puopolo" <dpuopolo at usa.net>
>
> chip:
>
> You are in the minority. Most people love the way that 128 kbps MP3s  
> sound. Of
> course, most people like the way the radio sounds too.
>
> Don't shoot the messinger-who happens to agree with you-but again  
> sits in the
> minority along side you.
>
> -D
>
> From: Broadcast List USER <Broadcast at fetrow.org>
>
> Sorry, Curt, but you are WRONG.
>
> I encrypt most of my music in Apple Lossless, and some in 320 kbps AAC
> +.  The latter is not that great, but it i OK on my iPod.  Running it
> through an STL and audio processing is not good though.
>
> I have several sets of IEMs that cost over $500, plus some really
> expensive headphones.  I also have some really nice speakers, Fried
> Model H and Quad electrostatics.