[BC] SB44 Ads, other observations

[Mike McCarthy]

In that case, I agree. I don't know what all the choice/rights folks were
all up in arms about.  In fact, the whole point was to CHOOSE life. Not
deny choice of any kind. HUGE difference.

The Tebow mother/son ad were rather beneign given the controversy. Seeing
his mom get accidentially pummeled...tackeled was rather funny. That was
the 2nd ad shown. The first one played at the end of the pre-game show and
was a little less "physical".

That's the problem with today's society.  We hyper-ventilate at the most
insipid of wording never once for a moment considering the other view
might be saying the SAME THING. Albiet with a different preferred result.
If I were the women's right people, I'd be more furious at the tackled
aspect showing abuse that the choose life message.

Which completely confounds the conservative and liberal mindsets. The
conservatives want LESS government interference with our lives in most
everything. Yet, in this instance they demand it and completely.  Liberals
want the reverse...government to stay out of the doctor's office.  But
more government oversight otherwise.

Go figure....

MM

> Yeah--I agree. Coke/Simpsons ad was the best!
>>
> And after all the fuss about the Tebow ad.....what in tarnation was the
> big deal about? Now, as I've said here before, I'm pro-choice, but I just
> didn't see that strong of an issue made in the ad that ran. In fact, I
> thought it was humorous and, yes, somewhat touching. If she chose NOT to
> have an abortion, God bless her, more power to her and I wish her and her
> family all the best. I wish the pro-choice leaders would choose their
> battles a little more carefully. IMO they shot themselves in the foot over
> this one.
>
> It's supposed to be a CHOICE, not a recommendation FOR one.
>
> --
> Jerry Mathis