[BC] Dealing with zoning and NIMBYS
Steve Lewis
steve at theengineeringbureau.com
Fri Feb 5 19:27:32 CST 2010
Slick! Good going!
The owner, in my case, still has the first dime he ever made and doesn't
want to part with any of his money, saying he couldn't afford it. So what
do I read today? He's going to bid on another bankrupt station.
Clearly a challenge to any of the zoning rules that required a team from
Dewey, Cheatum & Howe was out of the question.
-----O-riginal Message-----
You need to play the game by their rules to win..
I did just that. My non-comm got a power and height increase.
we were running 80 watts at 43 feet. the city has a 35 foot height
restriction on all antennas including TV.
The CP was for 1500 watts at 80 feet center of radiation. The
building was 30 feet tall and we planned on a 60 foot Rohn 25g on the roof
to give us the 90 feet required to meet the CP...
WOW the NIMBYS mostly the guys that have guys for partners on the
zoning board. who tells us what color the hardline must be to blend
into the background( you get the picture) no way is that Tower going
on a roof to messup the view the neighbors have... this took almost 2
years and lots of legal fees to fight. The lawyer accidently found a
clause in the city zoning rules about a structure being no more than
10% the height of the existing structure its being mounted on.
So I played ball....
Found the tallest building in the city a 13 story Building ( where
the station was origonally) made a minor CP change.. and was granted
920 watts at 147 feet. so we mounted a 40 foot Rohn 25 on the roof
to support the new antenna system..
The City tried to have us remove the tower and antenna, but we
played by their rules, and beat them.. I would rather have the height
than the power. so we did better than expected...
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list