[BC] Dealing with zoning and NIMBYS

Steve Lewis steve at theengineeringbureau.com
Fri Feb 5 19:27:32 CST 2010


Slick!  Good going!

The owner, in my case, still has the first dime he ever made and doesn't
want to part with any of his money, saying he couldn't afford it.  So what
do I read today?  He's going to bid on another bankrupt station.

Clearly a challenge to any of the zoning rules that required a team from
Dewey, Cheatum & Howe was out of the question.

-----O-riginal Message-----
  You need to play the game by their rules to win..
  I did just that. My non-comm got a power and height increase.
we were running 80 watts at  43 feet. the city has a 35 foot height 
restriction on all antennas including TV.
  The CP was for 1500 watts at 80 feet center of radiation. The 
building was 30 feet tall and we planned on a 60 foot Rohn 25g on the roof
  to give us the 90 feet required to meet the CP...
WOW the NIMBYS mostly the guys that have guys for partners on the 
zoning board. who tells us what color the hardline must be to blend 
into the background( you get the picture) no way is that Tower going 
on a roof to messup the view the neighbors have... this took almost 2 
years and lots of legal fees to fight. The lawyer accidently found a 
clause in the city  zoning rules about a structure being no more than 
10% the height of the existing structure its being mounted on.
  So I played ball....
  Found the tallest building in the city a 13 story Building ( where 
the station was origonally)  made a minor CP change.. and was granted 
920 watts at 147 feet.  so we mounted a 40 foot Rohn 25 on the roof 
to support the new antenna system..
  The City tried to have us remove the tower and antenna, but we 
played by their rules, and beat them.. I would rather have the height 
than the power. so we did better than expected...



More information about the Broadcast mailing list