[BC] BUREAU ADOPTS ORDER TO MODIFY FM DIGITAL
Broadcast List USER
Broadcast at fetrow.org
Mon Feb 1 23:45:04 CST 2010
You didn't explain how that helps the BUSINESS!
I believe it helps kill it off.
Explain how it doesn't.
It isn't as if our existing business is healthy.
We have very major chains in bankruptcy.
Explain how this helps the health of the industry!/
--chip
On Feb 1, 2010, at 1:20 PM, broadcast-request at radiolists.net wrote:
> Message: 28
> From: "Dana Puopolo" <dpuopolo at usa.net>
>
> I completely disagree, Chip.
> I think adding channels 5 and six would help a LOT! First off, you
> put most of
> the AM stations there (as Canada is doing with their AMs). Next, you
> allot one
> or two frequencies to the National Weather Service/Homeland Security-
> and have
> smart radios that automatically can go there in case of emergency.
> Finally you
> allot two or three channels for exclusive hobby use with 1 watt ERP.
>
> THREE problems solved in one swoop! Also, make the band 100% digital.
>
> -D
>
> @fetrow.org> wrote:
>> Jim:
>>
>> I totally agree, but there are those who want to take TV Channels
>> five
>> and six and add that 12 MHz to the 20 MHz of the FM band.
>>
>> I just don't get it. ?Let's make the business less profitable. ?Let's
>> spread the business over more than 50% more stations!
>>
>>> --chip
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list