[BC] Wisconsin family fears village will take down son's Ham radio tower

[Mike McCarthy]

Yes and no.  Part 97 has had a love/hate relationship with Part 15. I
don't have the Part 97 citation to refer, but the FCC has long stood that
the radio amateur must exhaust all reasonable means to correct TVI created
by the Part 97 station.  HOWEVER, if the radio amateur can proove their
emissions are within the permitted limits, they have met the rules and the
responsability lay with the equipment owner suffering the interference. 
Typically a spectrum analyzer was/is used to make this point.

MM

> Citation, please.
>
> Most consumer gear has historically had a label somewhere that
> affirmed that it must cheerfully accept any interference from a
> licensed service, has it not?
>
> Jeff/KD4RBG
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Cowboy <curt at spam-o-matic.net> wrote:
>>  You may not cause interference even if you are a licensed amateur.
>>  He *is* responsible for resolving complaints, or at least making all
>>  "reasonable" attempts at doing so.