[BC] Ampex 350
PeterH
peterh5322 at rattlebrain.com
Sat Apr 10 15:30:09 CDT 2010
On Apr 10, 2010, at 12:59 PM, wcj9996 wrote:
> The Ampex 350 had 3 small pins in the hubs that would engage in the
> slots around
> the center holes in the 3", 5" and 7" plastic reels. These soon
> broke off in mt
> experience. I drilled and taped holes in the Ampex hub for a
> threded pin that
> would engage all 3 sizes of the small plastic reels. It was not
> wise to use
> "long play" tape on the plastic reels with the standard hubs. We
> had some 7"
> plastic reels with larger hubs that we used for takeup with the
> plastic supply
> reels.
IIRC, the 350, and the rather similar 400 and 400A, utilized cast-in
radial splines.
These were made of the same material as the turntable itself, as
these were integrally-cast, hence these were Zamac® or a similar zinc-
aluminum alloy.
The 351 introduced cast-in steel pins, which were almost impervious
to breakage, unlike the cast-in Zamac splines. In this specific
respect, the 351's cast-in pins only superficially resembled a true
spline, but these were ever so much more durable, hence more reliable.
The 440 introduced a revised turntable, in which case an inserted,
and easily replaceable steel spline system was used. Held in my three
"button" head machine screws. These splines almost never failed.
There was a field bulletin for the installation of a single
cylindrical spacer, held in using a 4-40 UNC machine screw, at least
on the 400 (prior to the introduction of the 400A).
I have perhaps every variation of the above in my shop.
Basically, of you don't "man-handle" your machines, each variation
should last you a lifetime (well, at least YOUR lifetime).
The cast-in Zamac splines was, perhaps, the ONLY design faux-pas in
the 350 product.
But, as with about 50-percent of the mechanical details, and perhaps
100 percent of the electronic details, these were "borrowed" from the
400A.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list