[BC] WQXR Downgrade...
Burt I. Weiner
biwa at att.net
Mon Oct 12 09:39:38 CDT 2009
This is what happens when you have sales people that are nothing more
than order takers. You throw away a very large and loyal audience
because you don't know how to deal with it. I suppose it's not a lot
different than my attitude about rock music, "Who wants to listen to
that???" I know for certain that I'm not a minority. From what I
understand, WQXR was actually making money, it was just that the
owners needed quick cash because of debt. So what do you do(?) -
sell the goose.
Burt
>There sure are a BUNCH of disappointed WQXR listeners posting to that
>blog about the switch! Classical fans should just be HAPPY to still
>have ANY Station in the market with that format. Advertisers will now
>ONLY buy the 12+ Radio Stations...PERIOD.
>
>My question is this: Why on Earth did you reduce the Bandwidth of the
>Internet Stream? As cheap as Bit Casting is to do, why not keep the
>High Fidelity 93 kbps stream? As demanding as Classical Music, as
>well as Classical Music Fans are, a 32 kbps stream is just NOT going
>to deliver the quality it takes to send out that format.
>--
>
>73,
>Kevin Raper
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list