[BC] Some movement on the 3rd adjacent issue?

[Dana Puopolo]

AAAAH! Mark,

I see you've discovered what I call FCC PHYSICS-which has NOTHING to do with
classical physics whatsoever!

This is the SAME physics that says a 100 watt LPTV 7 channels above a full
power TV station had to be spaced 100 kM away, while it was okay for a 5
MEGAWATT full power TV so only have 92 kM spacing!

Got it? FCC physics states that 100 watts interferes MORE then FIVE MILLION
WATTS!

I'm sure there are plenty more examples out there. Does anyone else know any
other then the LPTV and LPFM ones above?

-D



From: Mark Earle <mearle at mearle.com>
Subject: Re: [BC] Some movement on the 3rd adjacent issue?


Now, how come it's OK in FCC-Verse for 2nd adjacent, 250w, 250' give-or 
take, but  a LPFM on a 3rd adjacent is such a threat? I'd much rather 
have a 3rd adjacent 100w 100' than these two things I've described.