[BC] Some movement on the 3rd adjacent issue?

[Mark Earle]

tpt at literock93r.com wrote:
> Note that the proposed legislation also allows translators on a third  
> adjacent.
> Dangerous. I had a battle with the Twin Falls boys who were trying to  
> put a 250 watt translator on my third adjacent (94.5 to my 93.9)  
> --inside my 60 dbu--and adjacent to the largest mall in our area.
>
>   
Shoot. There is a 96.1 translator well withing the 60dbU curve of a 96.5 
full C here.

The same "group" has a CP approved for a 97.1, again, well within th 60 
dbU curve of a 97.5 full C.

Now, how come it's OK in FCC-Verse for 2nd adjacent, 250w, 250' give-or 
take, but  a LPFM on a 3rd adjacent is such a threat? I'd much rather 
have a 3rd adjacent 100w 100' than these two things I've described.