[BC] KWVE and the NAL
Rich Wood
richwood at pobox.com
Tue Oct 6 12:56:59 CDT 2009
------ At 11:48 AM 10/6/2009, Barry Mishkind wrote: -------
>Now that most of you have had a chance to digest the issuance of a
>$5000 fine for a botched EAS test, have any of you heard of reaction
>from management/ownership to withdraw from LP-1 and LP-2 status?
Regardless of how it happened, a $5000 fine would seem to take the
incentive away. We had a similar thing happened in New York when the
system was first tested. The originating station didn't send the EOM.
New York had more Classical music stations for a few minutes than
anywhere in the world.
It's a good thing the PPM didn't exist then.
Ignoring the fine for a moment, what's the incentive for a station to
want to be at the head end of this thing? I remember whatever
followed Conelrad (EBS, I think) supplied the stations with equipment
and required them to have a sort of bomb shelter studio.
I think they should put Larry Fuss in charge of the whole thing. From
what I hear it worked during the earthquakes and tsunamis.
Rich
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list