[BC] Amateur radio spectrum

[RichardBJohnson at comcast.net]

No! You are saying things that I NEVER said!
I said (exactly); " When you fire up your 2-meter
3-watt push-to-talk to doubly your spectrum pollution
using your repeater, you just punched a 1-second
hole in the spectrum that could have transferred the entire
contents of your PC hard disk (if the disk had been fast enough)."

It's that near CW carrier that destroyed the ability of anybody
near you to use spread-spectrum communications. I never even mentioned
your misquoted, "In that paragraph, you state using a two meter radio,
running normal FM modulation, using just under  20 kHz bandwidth,
times two channels, repeater in and out, uses the same 
bandwidth as some scheme that you claim,..." It is sheer
unmitigated BS, up with which I shall not put.

The word "double" was a type, should have been "double,"
because you now have TWO pollution-generators on the air
at the same time.

Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson
Book: http://www.AbominableFirebug.com/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Bosscher" <tom at bosscher.org>

Whoa. Stop it right there. I asked you a question, based upon EXPRESSLY 
what you stated: And you side-stepped it, and you know it.

 >" When you fire up your 2-meter 3-watt push-to-talk to doubly
 >your spectrum pollution using your repeater, you just punched a
 >1-second hole in the spectrum that could have transferred
 >the entire contents of your PC hard disk (if the disk had been fast 
enough).'

     How much clearer can the question be? In that paragraph, you state 
using a two meter radio, running normal FM modulation, using just under 
20 kHz bandwidth, times two channels, repeater in and out, uses the same 
bandwidth as some scheme that you claim, again, in writing, that can 
pass 250 gigabits in one second.

    Again, please answer the question directed at YOUR statement. Stick 
to your stated and quoted statement of fact.

    tom bosscher