[BC] ANALOG SWITCHOFF GOES UNNOTICED

Harold Hallikainen harold at hallikainen.com
Mon Mar 2 09:21:02 CST 2009


ANALOG SWITCHOFF GOES UNNOTICED
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Thomas W. Hazlett]
[Commentary] When, in 1986, cell-phone makers and public safety agencies
asked the Federal Communications Commission for a shot at using scores of
idle TV channels, politically powerful TV stations quashed the idea. They
hurriedly hatched a reason: extra frequencies had to be reserved for
"advanced television." America, then reeling from Japan's emergence as a
consumer electronics powerhouse, needed to develop its own cool video
application and dominate the world. By the time the US made the switch to
digital television just last month, "free TV" was already dead. One
hundred million households now pay $600 or so per year to avoid it,
subscribing to cable or satellite. Well over 90 per cent of TV viewing
takes place in households opting out of broadcast delivery. And for a very
small additional investment - no more than $3bn - every last rabbit-eared
home in America could join them. Yet, the US is subsidizing off-air
receivers; $1.5bn has been allotted for digital set-top converters (two
$40 vouchers per family), and the Obama "stimulus" pumps in $650m more.
This is not merely money down the drain. In extending life-support to DTV
signals that hog hugely valuable frequencies, consumers lose hundreds of
billions worth of wireless service. The bandwidth available to iPhones,
Blackberrys and GPhones and other emerging technologies would double were
TV air waves to accommodate mobile apps as requested in 1985.
http://benton.org/node/22730

-- 
FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com -  
 




More information about the Broadcast mailing list