[BC] Windows NT Browse

[Cowboy]

On Tuesday 30 September 2008 07:27 pm, Tom wrote:

>  When I upgraded to W2KSP4...
>  
>  I deliberately left the drives at FAT32, rather than NTFS - to insure 
>  that the 9x machines could read/write the 2K drives.

 Unless you're dual-booting the machines to both OS, this is pointless.
 A client does not read or write server drives.
 It requests the server do it, and pass that information via the network
 file system, SMB only in the case of Micro$oft.
 Any of several protocols in the cases of any other OS.
 Any of the NTFS are far better than any of the FAT systems.

-- 
Cowboy