[BC] FCC Approves proposed AM MoM Rules

[Barry Mishkind]

This is something that has been "brewing" for twenty years. Given the 
ever increasing costs - and urban hassles - of doing a traditional 
proof vs the computer accuracy available these days, this seems to be 
a move forward, technologically.

Question for those really familiar with the new Rules: Does this 
expand, in any way, the bandwidth over which the pattern must be 
held?  (In other words, does it do anything about the radiation other 
than at carrier?)

At 08:07 AM 9/25/2008, Peter Moncure, wrote
>Method of Moments, as in Livermore Labs software called "NEC", or 
>its clones like MiniNec, NEC4 and so on.
>
>And yes, FCC approved this (the Part 73 regs anyhow) last 
>night.  The Part 17 regs, which may be moved to Part 1, are to be a 
>NPRM.  That will determine who has to detune new towers.  I wouldn't 
>be surprised if this gets bogged down with the migratory bird drama, 
>though with cats and skyscrapers I can't see how our corner of the 
>problem is worth fussing about.