[BC] I can still hear the signal, but...

[towers at mre.com]

I see that Burt. LISTENING involves not only the ability to receive and
comfortably decode, but also accepting the content as desirable. I wanted
to make a distinction about how a signal may be recievable, but
unlistenable due to other non-content related artifacts.

BTW..some of the quoted content attributed to me was by someone else.

MM

On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:02:28 -0700, "Burt I. Weiner" <biwa at att.net> wrote:
> I think you're all missing the point.  My comment had nothing to with
> any technical aspect or deficiency of the signal.  It has to do with
> the content!!!
> 
> I can still hear the signal but (I don't want to listen to it)!  I
> don't care how good it sounds - even if it sounds better than the
> human ear can possibly decerne.  If I don't want to listen to the
> content, I'm not going to listen Period!
> 
> Burt
> 
>>In a message dated 8/31/2008 5:03:40 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>Towers at mre.com writes:
>>
>>The problem is that the masses have the crappy radios.  No matter how 
> sweet
>>the transmitters signal is, a windshield antenna or $10 clock radio that
>>can't receive the station does no one any good.
> .com