[BC] Transmitter Safety
Rich Wood
richwood at pobox.com
Mon Apr 28 09:56:01 CDT 2008
------ At 04:29 AM 4/28/2008, Xmitters at aol.com wrote: -------
>It seems reasonable that the law would REQUIRE that an employee not be
>allowed to work on lethal voltage equipment alone or with an
>unprepared helper.
I don't think the word reasonable can be used with any accuracy where
the law (created by politicians) is concerned. Ask yourself who has
the most powerful lobbyists. (i.e most money contributed to
campaigns). Engineers? Or the NAB (representing owners).
Though most people can't receive it, HDNet ran Dan Rather Reports the
other night with some footage of Wal-Mart managers' meetings where
they were begging Managers for Wal-Pac contributions. It seems the
company hired to document years worth of meetings had no written
contract with the company. Wal-Mart wouldn't pay the $150 million the
company wanted for the library of tapes, so they're releasing the
stuff to the public via the media.
Wal-Mart realized it was in the same position as Microsoft. They
ignored Washington at their peril.
While I think that's unethical and would never hire that company, the
footage was very informative about how much it costs for 90 minutes
with a politician and what special treatment you can expect for your
money. The piece would dispel any doubt you might have had about the
best government money can buy.
We can spare a few electrocuted engineers. It's the cost of doing
business. However, the top dudes who are trashing once proud
companies' stock prices must be protected at all costs.
Rich
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list